INTRODUCTION TO PHILOSOPHY
 
 
Dr. Ted Toadvine
toadvint@emporia.edu
Office: Plumb Hall 411P
341-5566 (office); 341-5462 (Social Sciences Secretary)

 

Midterm Review Topics
 
 
Hinduism 
 
the path of joy versus the path of pleasure 
Atman, Brahman, Yoga 
how to break the cycle of rebirth
Buddhism 
 
doctrine of no-soul (anatman) and the "I" as a constant flux 
examples of the chariot, the child, the flame, the milk 
reincarnation and how to reach Nirvana
Hume 

empiricism and the “theater” view of the self 
criticisms of the idea of a self or soul 
identity versus diversity 
four reasons for our mistaken concept of “self”
Schopenhauer 
 
transcendental versus immanent knowledge 
individuality and two perspectives on death 
the Will to Live
Plato

the body as a hindrance to the soul’s search for wisdom
why philosophers look forward to death 
three arguments for immortality
the fate of pure and impure souls
Spelman

somatophobia, misogyny 
critique of Plato’s views on beauty, love, and the state 
soul/body hierarchy as a basis for oppression 
criticisms of contemporary feminism
Parfit 
 
split-brain cases and their philosophical implications 
ego theory vs. bundle theory of the self 
teleportation example
Sartre
 

existence precedes essence and the paper-cutter example 
traditional conceptions of god as artisan 
responsibility, anguish, forlornness, and despair 
existentialist humanism 
Beauvoir

criticisms of traditional definitions of “woman” and woman as “Other” 
male justifications and benefits of gender differences 
internal and external reasons why women put up with the sexist system 
concrete opportunities as the standard for equality
Zack

the problem and problematization of mixed race 
the racial schema and its political consequences 
differences between “black” and “white” ethnicity 
deracination and a new universalism 
Aristotle 
 
 

Happiness as the highest good for humans 
Three different versions of the happy life 
the function of human beings, and the three different kinds of souls 
two different components of virtue 
the bad, the weak-willed, the strong-willed, and the virtuous 
Mencius
 
humans as naturally good, bad as the result of external forces 
four natural endowments 
examples: the whirlpool, the barley, the sandals. 
Kant

the Good Will 
inclinations vs. duties 
the shopkeeper example 
the categorical imperative
Bentham
 
the two “sovereign masters of mankind” 
the Principle of Utility and the definition of happiness 
hedonistic calculus 
Schweitzer
 

definition of good and the origins of indifference 
the natural struggle for survival versus compassion and empathy 
the three temptations and the three responses 
distinguishing joy from happiness 
McGaa

American Indian values versus non-Indian values 
The Great Spirit and the four commandments 
views on european migration, war, racism, religious diversity 
"we are all related" 
Hospers

the five criteria for responsibility and their rejection 
why we are not ultimately responsible for our failures or successes 
explanation for the success of someone from the “wrong side of the tracks” 
legal vs. moral responsibility 

Possible Essay Questions
1. Carefully summarize Beauvoir’s views on how women have traditionally been viewed in Western culture. In what ways has this traditional view been supported, and who has benefitted? How does Beauvoir think women should be viewed, and what changes does she suggest to bring this about? Do you agree with her position? Explain your answer.

2. How should people live, or what standards should they follow, in order to lead moral lives? Explain and compare the answers offered by two of the following: Aristotle, Kant, Bentham, Schweitzer, or McGaa. Whose views concerning morality are most convincing? Explain your reasoning.

3. Carefully explain Hospers' claims that we are not morally responsible for our actions. What definitions of responsibility does he reject? Why are we ultmately unable to take responsibility for our successes or failures? Should we bother making moral judgements at all? Do you find Hosper’s position convincing? Why or why not?



Return to Introduction to Philosophy

Send comments to Ted Toadvine.
Last Updated: 2 February 2001