ESU / Liberal Arts & Sciences / Biology /

home
page
Index of Issues  |   Issues in Other Languages   |   Requests  |   Staff

KSN
Volume 36
Number 3
February 1990
(Reprint of 1991 issue)
ISSN: 0022-877X


ABOUT THIS ISSUE
- about KSN
-
about the author

IN THIS ISSUE
- introduction
- "arguments" voiced by opponents of dissection
- will you have a 'Jenifer'?
- general strategies
- guidelines for good dissections
- the "hammer test"
- wherein lies "meaning"?
- sensory scale
- developing students' powers of observation
- vivisection
- shortcomings of "alternatives"
- palpation
- the modern muscle misconception - a case for reality
- the text and the lab
- lysenko - the case against abstractions
- student blood labs
- what is wrong with the NABT polcy on dissection?
- consequences of eliminating the real experience base
- summary
- further reading
- read this - it concerns your future


This page was last modified:
November 8, 2003 3:31 PM

Originally posted:
March 19, 2003


 

Dissection
by John Richard Schrock


CONSEQUENCES OF ELIMINATING THE REAL EXPERIENCE BASE

- If the current trend to replace real experiences (including dissections) with abstractions continues, we can expect even more citizens to suffer and even die from waiting too long to gain medical care, all because such "meaningless" education provided no lasting understanding of human biology. Biology teachers should talk with local physicians to confirm the abysmal level of anatomical/medical understanding among American citizenry, and then work to double the high school laboratory coursework required in both anatomy/physiology and ecology/ organismic biology.

- The public will not appreciate the diversity and complexity of living organisms and ecosystems, nor under-stand the evolving concepts developed by the science process. Such a public will support inadequate or ignorant health and environmental policies.

- Non-scientific attitudes about exploratory surgery, autopsy (see The Scientist Oct. 30, 1989), and cremation will increase, with great medical and social costs.

- Because the real world (including dissection) is intrinsically motivating to most students, the decrease in truly “hands-on” experiences will contribute to the continued decline of American students who pursue science careers.

- Foreign schools have been traditionally more authority-based, with standard “leaving exams” forcing teachers to teach-to-the-test. Such foreign schools often utilized recitation and authority-based teaching that provided little recognition for independent reality-based thinking. American schools have traditionally left curricula to each teacher and have been lab oriented in the sciences. As we abandon reality-based lab and field work for non-lab AP courses, teach-to-the-test proficiency levels, and computer simulations, we are moving in the wrong direction at the very time foreign schools are improving. While the number of students entering the “science pipeline” and the level of general public science literacy is falling rapidly in the United States, it is climbing rapidly overseas.



Next Section:
- summary

  The Kansas School Naturalist |  Department of Biology
College of Liberal Arts & Sciences  |   Emporia State University

© Copyright 1977-2002 Terms of Use  |  Privacy