ESU / Liberal Arts & Sciences / Biology /

home
page
Index of Issues  |   Issues in Other Languages   |   Requests  |   Staff

KSN
Volume 36
Number 3
February 1990
(Reprint of 1991 issue)
ISSN: 0022-877X


ABOUT THIS ISSUE
- about KSN
-
about the author

IN THIS ISSUE
- introduction
- "arguments" voiced by opponents of dissection
- will you have a 'Jenifer'?
- general strategies
- guidelines for good dissections
- the "hammer test"
- wherein lies "meaning"?
- sensory scale
- developing students' powers of observation
- vivisection
- shortcomings of "alternatives"
- palpation
- the modern muscle misconception - a case for reality
- the text and the lab
- lysenko - the case against abstractions
- student blood labs
- what is wrong with the NABT polcy on dissection?
- consequences of eliminating the real experience base
- summary
- further reading
- read this - it concerns your future


This page was last modified:
November 8, 2003 3:29 PM

Originally posted:
March 19, 2003


 

Dissection
by John Richard Schrock


Further Reading:

Goodall, Jane. 1987. A Plea for the Chimpanzees. American Scientist 75: 574-577. An authoritative defense of humane treatment for primates.

Griffin, Donald. 1984. Animal Thinking. Harvard University Press, Cambridge. 237 pages. A credentialed and experienced scientist gathers together scientific evidence of animal consciousness with an awareness of the pitfalls and limitations of studies in this area.

Office of Technological Assessment, Congress. 1988. Alternatives to Animal Use in Research, Testing and Education. U.S. Gov. Printing Office. 441 pages. $59.75. Chapter 9 of this book, "Animal Use in Education and the Alternatives" is an essential resource to the biology teacher, although it fails to recognize the primacy of a real experience base in learning and in science.

Orlans, F. Barbara. 1988. “Debating Dissection.” The Science Teacher November, 1988 pages 36-40.

Regan, Tom. 1983. The Case for Animal Rights. University of California Press, Berkeley. This is an exhaustive discussion of the various philosophies of “animal rights” from a proponent's perspective.

Schrock. J.R. 1983. Computers in Science Education. American Biology Teacher 46: 252-256.

The Kansas School Naturalist fully supports the use of living animals in science classrooms.

See: Vol. 22 No. 3 The Carp: A Manual Stressing Observation

Vol. 25 No. 2 Animals in the Classroom



Next Section:
-
read this - it concerns your future

  The Kansas School Naturalist |  Department of Biology
College of Liberal Arts & Sciences  |   Emporia State University

© Copyright 1977-2002 Terms of Use  |  Privacy