General Education Council
Summary of 1995-1996
Rodney J. Sobieski, Director of General Education
The Council’s efforts over the past year were targeted on several diverse elements of General Education. In the following highlights, those items which are summarized are those that the Council expressed intent and/or resolution about.
Critical Thinking
This was a topic explored by the Council in that Dave Dungan
visited a meeting and shared his research on the topic.
This was dovetailed with an experiment that was formulated
between the council and the Office of Assessment that
will develop a pilot study to follow a group of students
throughout their ESU tenure in order to assess the Critical
Thinking skills, and determine how they might change
during their time at ESU. McGlone’s office and
L.A. & S. will fund a Critical Thinking interactive
program during the 963 semester as a method to get faculty
thinking about these issues and how they might be improved.
Competency Exams
Ed McGlone requested through the Faculty Senate that the
General Education Council serve as the faculty body responsible
for advising the administration concerning policy and
procedures affecting the university-wide competency examination
requirement. This was approved by the Council, but the
Faculty Senate did not act on this request during ’95-’96.
The Council discussed alternatives to the competency
exams and requested that Sobieski and McGlone present
a policy detailing alternatives, and information on concordance
exams for our first meeting next year.
Computer Literacy
It is a goal to have computer literacy acquisition or competency
added as a documental skill to the outcomes of our General
Education program. Since this is an ever-moving target,
the Council approved a survey of division chairs to determine
present and future student needs. Although it appeared
from those results that student needs are being meet
through formal and informal freshman to determine their
knowledge, attitude and skills regarding computing. Those
results are due at the end of the summer, and will be
used to determine the direction the Council will take.
MultiCultural Intensive Sections
The Council accepted with minor modification the Multicultural
Intensive (MCI) Task Force’s recommendations on
the clarifications of the Cultural Diversity Goal. Those
recommendations on the clarification of the Cultural
Diversity Goal. Those recommendations which were approved
by the Council and adopted by Vice President Payne, changed
the title of the General Education Cultural Literacy
section VIII, from Multicultural Experiences to Cultural
Diversity. Secondly, it requires that students enroll
in at least one general education course section that
is designated as multicultural intensive. Lastly it defines
the multicultural designation for general education sections
as reserved for courses that focus on issues of race,
ethnicity and gender, but also allows MCI courses to
expand within two years to include courses focusing on
international and intercultural diversity or special
sub cultural diversity, for example, culture of hearing
or mobility impaired. The Council also accepted with
minor modification the Guidelines for MCI designation
of courses as provided by the MCI Task Force. The Council
evaluated the MCI experiment began by Dean Black by having
faculty and students visit with the Council in addition
to looking at course syllabi. It was this pilot experiment
that gave the Council the basis for accepting and approving
the recommendations of the MCI Task Force.
Evening General Education Offerings
The Council discussed this by way of an analysis of current
and past offerings. Chairs were made aware of the commitments
for sections of General Education courses to be offered
in the evening time slot. Non-prime time offerings (noon
on) for 955 and 961 were also surveyed and it was found
that approximately 35% of sections are in the non-prime
time slot.
Student Focus Groups
Gary Wyatt spoke to the Council on surveys conducted in
his Social Research classes on student attitudes towards
General Education. Although he pointed out that one dimension
to the issues are faculty attitudes, student attitudes
were considered for further exploration. To this end,
Student Focus Groups were used by the Council six times
during the year to get students talking about these matters.
Lunches were provided students and members of the Council
attended. This strategy was suggested by the Council
to remain in place for next year.
Redesign of Licensure of Kansas Educators
The Council discussed the General Studies section of the
Redesign document and approved Sobieski to speak at one
of the public hearings. A letter was drafted detailing
the Council’s concerns and given to the hearing
committee following his oral remarks.
New Format for Class Schedule
The Council approved a revised format for listing General
Education courses in the upcoming Schedule of classes.
It will follow what is used in the SAC office for uniformity,
and will also detail unique major or certification course
requirements related to General Education.
Last Updated April 17, 2007

